6 Responses for "iPhone / iTouch 1.1.3 - New Apps"

1. DJ January 17th, 2008 at 10:00 am 1

   Except that this is a move from Apple charging for products (iPods, music) to charging for functionality. Is this the first time they’ve done that? I think it’s rip-off and potentially disturbing move.

   More here: http://onlinemarketer.wordpress.com/2008/01/17/steve-jobs-sucks/

2. David January 17th, 2008 at 10:28 am 2

   First off, thanks for the comments “DJ”.

   Since it’s the principle, not the money, that has you peeved - I felt that way briefly until I read about Apple views the iTouch vs. the iPhone/Apple TV updates (which were free). John explains it best in his keynote wrapup. You should give it a read:

   http://daringfireball.net/2008/01/keynote_roundup

   I admit, paying for apps that already existed on the iPhone arks me a little. But just a little, because these apps are awesome. But since this isn’t a software upgrade (like 1.1.3) I can understand Apple’s side about asking a little $$$ from iTouch users vs. iPhone users.

   Also, since the SDK is coming out next month, more and different versions of these apps will come out. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is just another “premium” charge to get apps early and six months down the road Apple offers them for free. Early adaptors always run a risk - this applies to EVERYTHING in technically. To say that early adapters should stay away from Apple is foolish - might as well not by anything electronic.

   Regarding the your “Steve Job Sucks” rant, it seems like a drastic thing to say from the guy/company that gave us the wonderful (which nobody in their right mind would argue) iphone and itouch only a year ago. But it’s typical thinking in the tech world that “you are only as good as your last job” (no pun intended).

3. Adam January 20th, 2008 at 6:09 pm 3

   Personally I think this is just Apple trying to make even moore money out of a product that is already majoraly over priced! It’s no wonder that so maney people are jailbreaking their iPods and from the charge Apple are putting on 5 fairly average Apps, its no wonder Apple are trying to stop them.

4. David January 20th, 2008 at 6:40 pm 4

   Adam, are you sure you’re not confusing iTouch with the iPhone? The $20 for apps was only for the iTouch, and I personally don’t think $299 for an iTouch is “majoraly over priced”. The iPhone, maybe.

   Also I don’t think Apple is trying to stop anyone from getting new apps into their iTouch, since the SDK for the iTouch and the iPhone is coming out next month. Are you reading the latest news?

5. will January 23rd, 2008 at 11:36 pm 5

   While I’m not sure why Apple needs to charge iTouch buyers 20 smakkers for what seems like some pretty basic functionality, I don’t think anyone can say that the device is overpriced. While I think the thing is pretty damn cool and exciting, its not like anyone really “needs” it. It is a thing of profound, but cool, luxury. It takes lots of raw material to make microchips processors and stuff like that. It not like anyone needs it to keep them from starving, or freezing to death in the winter… Its just a super advanced toy.

6. How To Be an A-List Blogger - Commenting (Part 1 In a Series) « OnlineMarketer blog February 28th, 2008 at 7:09 am 6

   [...] I’ve had good success with the tech crowd, despite not being an expert. This quote is third on my all-time list of referrer (38 people) and this one on Engadget a bit further down on [...]